• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The World of Direct Selling

The World of Direct Selling is direct sales industry's leading online publication.
  • Home
  • Advertise with Us
  • Free Newsletter
  • Newsletter Archive
  • About
  • Contact

A Significant Page in the History of Direct Sales: FTC vs Amway (1975-1979)

February 22, 2021 Leave a Comment

FTCIn March 1975, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (*) accused Amway of operating as an illegal pyramid scheme, violating the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act. Contrary to many people might think, the case against this major direct seller was not resolved in a few months but actually took four years until 1979.

FTC’s five accusations filed in 1975 against Amway were quite severe:

* Amway was engaged in resale price maintenance.
* Amway allocated customers among distributors and restricted distributors’ source of supply as well as outlets through which they may resell.
* Amway restricted the distributors’ advertising.
* Amway misrepresented that substantial income may be obtained from geometrical increases in the number of distributors in the chain.
* Amway misrepresented the profitability of a distributorship and the potential for recruiting new distributors and failed to disclose the substantial business expense involved and the high turnover of distributors.

After four years in 1979, it was ruled that the company had been conducting a legitimate business but not a pyramid and Amway prevailed.

The significance of this decision for the rest of the direct sales community was that the FTC was making distinctions in its ruling between an illegal pyramid and a legitimate multilevel marketing program. The FTC said “Amway differed in several ways from pyramid schemes that the Commission had challenged. It did not charge an up-front ‘head hunting’ or large investment fee from new recruits, nor did it promote ‘inventory loading’ by requiring distributors to buy large volumes of nonreturnable inventory.”


This did not mean that the FTC had left Amway free of any orders to follow: Amway had to stop retail price-fixing; misrepresenting profits, earnings or sales; allocating customers among their distributors; and had to print a specific disclaimer on its suggested retail price lists. In other words, the ruling didn’t make Amway look very good, but it provided an essential shield to network marketing companies, including Amway itself.

The famous “70% rule” has also been an industry standard or a “Golden Rule” following this case. Amway was requiring from its distributors to sell or personally use a minimum of 70% of any previously purchased products before placing a new order. And this was recognized by the FTC as one of the signs of not being a pyramid scheme.

This case has been considered as the most significant cases in the history of direct selling by many. Jeff Babener, a well-recognized authority in legal issues whom we sadly lost last year, had said, “Had Amway lost, MLM history after 1979 may have been nonexistent. Amway’s victory paved the way for hundreds of MLM companies that would follow. So significant was the decision that the FTC during the next 20 years focused on ‘deceptive’ practices of MLM companies such as earnings representations or medical claims rather than attacking the ‘structure’ of MLM programs.”

The FTC’s Former General Counsel Debra A. Valentine commented in a speech in 1998, that FTC’s decision in 1979 was a “landmark decision” that distinguished an illegal pyramid from a legitimate multilevel marketing program.

(*) The Federal Trade Commission or the FTC in short, has the regulatory authority over direct selling businesses in the U.S. It sets anti-pyramid standards and determines the business standards to be used by legitimate companies.

…..

Hakki Ozmorali is the publisher of The World of Direct Selling.Hakki Ozmorali is the Founder of WDS Consultancy, a management consulting and online publishing firm in Canada, specialized in providing services to direct selling firms. WDS Consultancy is a Supplier Member of the Canada DSA. It is the publisher of The World of Direct Selling, global industry’s leading weekly online publication since 2010. Hakki is an experienced professional with a strong background in direct sales. His work experiences in direct selling include Country and Regional Manager roles at various multinationals. You can contact Hakki here.

SHARE THIS ARTCLE:

Tagged With: Amway, compensation plan, compliance, FTC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

This Month in History

In April 1990, Avon asked a U.S. federal court to void the purchases of Avon shares made by an investor group. This investor group had already acquired close to 20% stake in the company. Among others, the organization included representatives of Avon’s competitor, Mary Kay Inc.

Actually, Mary Kay had tried to take over Avon before, too. Following that unsuccessful attempt, it joined some other investors for another try. Mary Kay then, announced early in 1991 that it was withdrawing from this group. Shortly after this, the group sold most of its shares.

Indulge in tradition and style with Turkish towels.

Guest Authors @ The WDS

Jeff Babener
Michel Bayan
Brett Duncan
Ben Gamse
Vince Han
Bob Hipple
Steve Jamieson
Sebastian Leonardi
Rick Loy
Alan Luce
Peter Maddox
Dan Murphy
Max Pecherskyi
Andi Sherwood
Rich Schubkegel
Don Sorensen
Brent Warrington
Bobbie Wasserman
Crayton Webb
Ben Woodward
Daryl Wurzbacher

Upcoming Events

US DSA ENGAGE 2021 Virtual Leadership Conference, June 7-9, 2021

WFDSA 2020 World Congress, October 6-8, 2021, Bangkok, Thailand

8th European Direct Selling Conference, October 12-13, 2021, Brussels, Belgium

Search Within the Site

Article Archive

Copyright © 2021 · WDS Consultancy